Christodoulopoulou: Risk of NATO's involvement in the Aegean
Christodoulopoulou: Risk of NATO's involvement in the Aegean
The "serious dangers of NATO involvement in the Aegean" for both "peace in the Middle East" and the "European edifice of human rights," said the Tasia Christodoulopoulou.
Speaking to the "Journal of Journalists", the current vice president of the Parliament and former Deputy Minister Policy Migration responds to SME tranche reviewed the activities of the refugee.
• Where does the sudden decision of EU the development of NATO forces in the Aegean?
It was first seen by the Greek risk of entanglement in military operations in the neighborhood. It is evident that this is the design of America and Turkey, pursuing active Turkish participation in territorial operations in Syria. The feast determined now. When preparing the peace, the war escalates, to enhance the players their positions on the deal.
Turkey has in fact a dual aim, the extermination of the Syrian Kurds, and its participation in the "recovery" of a country that has become debris. Greece has neither asked nor agreed on this leg. However, the consent of the NATO presence in the Aegean are reasonable concerns. So far, due to the non-involvement of our country in war, the countries of the Middle East faced us with either neutral or active sympathy. Today, threatened peace in the region.
• In the past Members of SYRIZA faced the dilemma whether to continue supporting a government that can not follow its own policy. How did you experience this concern?
This motley alliance mechanisms, centers of interest and the willing, which seeks to decay and fall of the government, can not find accomplices to the Parliamentary Group of SYRIZA.
This does not mean that SYRIZA may continue so without seriously discuss and collectively the dilemmas we face every day, the dead ends of political choices we make and the answers to the questions raised us to the limits of the compromises we can do.
What responds to critics
Merely to constantly repeat the answer I gave, that immigrants basking in question "ingenious" journalist "what do immigrants in Omonia Square" in order to demonstrate to sample my irrelevance. Unlike the question, which was sampled journalistic "intelligence", he believes, like their thoughtful analyzes of the causes of the large refugee stream, which attributed to me. However, even today, despite the communication war I received, I continue to choose when, how and with whom to speak in public.
"Mr. Panousis not remember had submitted any proposal for improving conditions in the cabinet. Instead, Mr. Panousis was he accepted under pressure to meet the police on the islands needs. It is known that devises the imagination of things, in which an actor or victim. The war made me throughout my minister was phenomenal. me even today attribute the responsibility that I invited the refugees to come to Greece, because I'm a fan of open borders without any relevant evidence to do so, "says she.
The "serious dangers of NATO involvement in the Aegean" for both "peace in the Middle East" and the "European edifice of human rights," said the Tasia Christodoulopoulou.
Speaking to the "Journal of Journalists", the current vice president of the Parliament and former Deputy Minister Policy Migration responds to SME tranche reviewed the activities of the refugee.
• Where does the sudden decision of EU the development of NATO forces in the Aegean?
It was first seen by the Greek risk of entanglement in military operations in the neighborhood. It is evident that this is the design of America and Turkey, pursuing active Turkish participation in territorial operations in Syria. The feast determined now. When preparing the peace, the war escalates, to enhance the players their positions on the deal.
Turkey has in fact a dual aim, the extermination of the Syrian Kurds, and its participation in the "recovery" of a country that has become debris. Greece has neither asked nor agreed on this leg. However, the consent of the NATO presence in the Aegean are reasonable concerns. So far, due to the non-involvement of our country in war, the countries of the Middle East faced us with either neutral or active sympathy. Today, threatened peace in the region.
• In the past Members of SYRIZA faced the dilemma whether to continue supporting a government that can not follow its own policy. How did you experience this concern?
This motley alliance mechanisms, centers of interest and the willing, which seeks to decay and fall of the government, can not find accomplices to the Parliamentary Group of SYRIZA.
This does not mean that SYRIZA may continue so without seriously discuss and collectively the dilemmas we face every day, the dead ends of political choices we make and the answers to the questions raised us to the limits of the compromises we can do.
What responds to critics
Merely to constantly repeat the answer I gave, that immigrants basking in question "ingenious" journalist "what do immigrants in Omonia Square" in order to demonstrate to sample my irrelevance. Unlike the question, which was sampled journalistic "intelligence", he believes, like their thoughtful analyzes of the causes of the large refugee stream, which attributed to me. However, even today, despite the communication war I received, I continue to choose when, how and with whom to speak in public.
"Mr. Panousis not remember had submitted any proposal for improving conditions in the cabinet. Instead, Mr. Panousis was he accepted under pressure to meet the police on the islands needs. It is known that devises the imagination of things, in which an actor or victim. The war made me throughout my minister was phenomenal. me even today attribute the responsibility that I invited the refugees to come to Greece, because I'm a fan of open borders without any relevant evidence to do so, "says she.
Σχόλια
Δημοσίευση σχολίου